Now here is a new debate that I have heard nothing about until now, Pharmacists' Rights (free subscription required). This amounts to a Pharmacists right to deny a women a birth control prescription if it violates their personal moral or religious beliefs.
How smart it is to jump into a conversation about "reproductive rights" after My Darling Wife and I so enraged Patia over our stand that all people are created equal whether they are men, women, white, black, red, yellow, purple, or green may not be real brilliant but I find this Pharmacists' Rights so unbelievable as to defy imagination.
Don't get me wrong, Pharmacists have the right to their moral convictions but I have no concept what the problem is with dispensing birth control pills. Aren't there enough unwanted children in the world without adding more to the mix? Birth control pills, whether you agree with todays moral code or not that allows casual sex with no commitments as a part of everyday life, are one bullet in a range of products to help women who don't want to have children. This is very important and Pharmacists denying them to women appears to me to fall into the category of hurting people instead of helping them.
Now the morning after pill discussed in the article falls under a little different category. Does life actually start at the moment of fertilization or once the egg attaches itself to the womb? That's a question we will never know the answer to but everybody has their own idea on the situation. I feel until the egg attaches itself to the womb it is not actually a life so any probation about taking a life does not apply. I can understand where other people might feel different which is why I say this falls a little different.
What is so unbelievable about all of this is the Pharmacists not transferring the prescription to another pharmacy if they will not fill it. This has to violate some kind of law or ethical code. I can't believe that it doesn't. While I may not agree with a Pharmacists personal moral or religious beliefs that keeps them from filling a prescription, I can understand their stand but not agree with it, but to not transfer the prescription is wrong, period.
I just can't understand what is going on in society that leads to such things. If you want to help people, help them, don't use religion to hurt them. That's not what Christianity today should be about even though more and more it is being used that way. How sad.
Laws, religions, creeds, and systems of ethics, instead of making society better than its best unit, make it worse than its average unit, because they are never up to date. George Bernard Shaw













The only odd part of this debate is why a pharmacists group would want to make this kind of information known.
Most modern pharmacies are not owned or operated by a single person anymore. They're all large conglomerates (mostly) that have a staff of pharmacists. If one person refused to fill a precription (i.e. transferring pills from a large container to a small one) another person could easily do it, without the consumer being none the wiser.
What's next? Stoning those who drive on the sabbath? A great big "thank you" to the loving, tolerant, and Christ-like "Christians" out there...who wouldn't know true morality or kindness if it bit them in the ass.
Mike
I think Mike's comments are a little over board. I am certainly a Christian and I am sure most would consider me to be conservative but I do not think I am intolerant. I never had an abortion but unless I am willing to be actively involved in caring for EVERY unwanted child to be concieved in the world, I won't try to make my morality apply to anyone else.
As you ponder reproductive rights, consider this question: Why will many insurance plans pay for prescriptions for Viagra or similar products but very few will pay for birth control pills?
should give us all a reason to be a little scared about the future.
Mike
Our biggest health care issue is finding a doctor to treat anyone, period. There is one GP in this town of about 6000 who admits people to the hospital. One other who sends you to ER if he can't treat you through his office. I go south another 38 miles for a doctor but everyone can't do that.
Mike
Also, I hear some dental office employees complaining about the meth mouth folks. I don't know that they have been turned away but I also don't know that they haven't.
It might not be popular to say this but... providing free dental care to those jailed with mets actually saves us $$. While on the surface it might appear that such services must be "cosmetic," a number of very horrible infections can enter the body through 'bad teeth.' If a single inmate contracted SBE, or sub-acute bacterial endocarditis, it would cost the taxpayers upwards of over $50,000 (add another $100K if the person needs a valve replacement) to treat this infection, which would take months.
Perhaps the folks in the dental office don't understand that it is cheaper to treat a little problem before it has the chance to become a much larger, and costly one.
Mike
Family planning clinics are located in urban areas (and not all of them). Sortof shoots your theory in the foot as many women who would be affected by this are located in rural and semi-rural areas. Virtually all individually owned pharmacies in my state have been replaced by chains. Walmart is the only chain in my area that have caused any issues regarding BCPs (another reason not to shop there).
I suppose these pharmacists will also remove the condoms from the store.