Has anyone else seen the shyster lawyers on TV trying to drum up buisness with the Vioxx problem? Now there was a problem and restitution might be in order to some people but do these lawyers need to be advertising for this buisness on national TV. I will not belive that they are doing this to help people. It's greed pure and simple and wrong. Then lawyers wonder why people have such a low opinion of them. This just shows you why.
No splints yet invented will heal a lawyer's broken reputation. Paul O'Neil
Thursday, October 21. 2004
Shysters
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
The only ads worse then those lawyers are the ads for drugss
#1
Joe G
on
2004-10-21 23:01
However, with the way they promoted it and the way they are now promoting Celebrex on television and the way they don't tell us when the testing doesn't prove their point, I think they deserve all the pains they can get. After all, they spend more for advertising the drugs than they do in research. And I have taken both of them, as has my wife, and they didn't work for either of us, so we went off them. And am I glad now. It's the same old south end of a north bound cow from the pharmaceuticals again.
#2
Chuck Rightmire
(Homepage)
on
2004-10-22 22:52
I can't argue with the advertising they did they will get what they deserve, but the shysters that are so busy advertising are just taking advantage of the situation, not truly concerned about helping people which just irks the shit out of me!
#3
Sarpy Sam
(Homepage)
on
2004-10-23 03:58
The author does not allow comments to this entry
